Tag Archives: systemology basic course

This message is posted by the Mardukite Admin Webmaster. It was delivered to the Mardukite Systemology HQ via Joshua Free’s personal messenger; penned at the remote underground Ascension Hermitage. It has been reviewed and edited by JFI Publication Staff as part of a series of Joshua Free’s final public transmissions. These cryptic writings first appeared on the mardukite.com blog site. (Nabu’s Journal Archive: Public-03A02)

Greetings, Dear Friends and Seekers.

Did you hear the one about the Persian King? He consulted his council of wise sages; asked them to produce a magic ring that could make him happy in times of sadness. After deliberating amongst themselves, they gave to him a simple ring with the inscribed words: THIS TOO SHALL PASS, with the clear implication that in this ever-evolving artificial creation you consider material reality… Nothing Lasts Forever.

You would think that the ‘apparent solidity’ of all this existence denotes some greater degree of ‘realness’ for its ‘reality’. But such a description only applies to a world with a ‘black’-and-‘white’ nature of only extreme conditions. Our existence, the one we experience day-to-day, does not support that belief. Yet many cling to it. It is a matter of fact that our existence is a projection across an entire spectrum of grays and hues and quantum leaps of perturbed energies; and at its core, not very ‘solid’ at all (and actually quite ‘mercurial’).

In the Fundamentals of Systemology (New Standard Systemology Basic Course), one of the little known influences to early Systemology development is introduced: Charles Fort, author of ‘Book of the Damned’ (1919). In it, he essentially open with the words that “By ‘the Damned’, I mean the Excluded” and that…

THE EXCLUDED WILL SOME DAY BE THE EXCLUDING.

Of course, the literal context Fort was referring to was ideas and data that the mainstream (authorities) had ‘Excluded’ – and then further existential allusions of ‘beingness‘ in general; but we would be hard pressed to objectify such conceptions as separate from the individuals that create and carry them…

So, by the damned, I mean the excluded.

But by the excluded I mean that which will some day be the excluding.

Or everything that is, won’t be.

And everything that isn’t, will be;

But, of course, will be that which won’t be.

It is our expression that the flux between that which isn’t and that which won’t be, or the state that is commonly and absurdly called ‘existence’, is a rhythm of heavens and hells: that the damned won’t stay damned; that salvation only precedes perdition.

The inference is that some day our accursed tatterdemalions will be sleek angels. Then the sub-inference is that some later day, back they’ll go whence they came.

It is our expression that nothing can attempt to ‘be’, except by attempting to ‘exclude’ something else: that that which is commonly called ‘being’ is a state that is wrought more or less definitely proportionately to the appearance of positive difference between that which is ‘included’ and that which is ‘excluded’.

It would be all too easy to quote the entirety of Fort’s first chapter (and it is something worthwhile to review and meditate upon). Certainly some will be able to read between the lines.

What is happening now? Well, personally, it is of great comfort that I completed the work I set out to make available after so many years of writing (among other things necessary to the visible work). That work is referred to a “New Standard Systemology” and is supported by an entire library of my formerly published works.

IF IT WASN’T FOR ANTI-FASCISTS IN THE 1940s: YOU, YOUR PARENTS, YOUR CHILDREN, WOULD ALL BE SPEAKING GERMAN.

It is no coincidence that the written, published or broadcast “word” is often the last shred of stability and wall of resilience maintained by a suppressed culture under rising rule of authoritarianism. It is a gray day when bookstores accurately relocate classic “dystopian sci-fi” literature to “current event” shelves.

And it is something that current generations have not experienced before in America (often conceived of as these ‘Divided States‘ during this Second American Civil War unleashed publicly by ultra-conservative ignorance-fueled MAGA-culture during a traitorous insurrection on January 6, 2021), but of which has been swelling to spread even wider in this unusually technocratic age.

Authoritarian control of ‘free speech’, ‘free press’, and ability to ‘soap box’, is destruction of the last line of defense between a ‘free state’ and a ‘fascist regime’… and it has happened now in America.

And while it seems like a bit of 20/20 hindsight at this point, let’s just take a moment to intellectually review the other lines of defense that have fallen. It’s not a matter of my opinion, but of intelligence — and just maybe where you might want to put your attention if you hope to have a habitable country in 400 days.

For example, Lawrence Britt (a historian) studied the fascist regimes of our past and present (including the authoritarian examples of Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Pinochet, and Suharto) and he found fourteen “characteristics of fascism” that they all held in common. So, what are they?

1. Powerful Continuous Nationalism.
2. Disdain for Recognition of Human Rights.
3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause of Problems.
4. Supremacy of the Military.
5. Rampant Sexism.
6. Obsessive Emphasis on National Security.
7. Religion and Government are Intertwined.
8. Protection of Corporate Power.
9. Suppression of Labor Power.
10. Disdain for Intellectuals, Scientists and the Arts
11. Obsession with Crime and Punishment.
12. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption
13. Fraudulent Elections.
14. Controlled Mass Media.

While it would be easy to point out the current-affair examples for each of these, such is not my intention in this discourse. It has never been my goal to ‘tell’ people what to think, or ‘how’ to think — and my Systemology work is simply a way of clearing the field in order to be ‘able’ to think.

ONLY A TRULY FASCIST AUTHORITARIAN REGIME WOULD OPENLY DECLARE THAT ANTI-FASCIST SENTIMENTS ARE PUNISHABLE TERRORISM.

So many individuals believe they are ‘thinking clearly’ and this is probably more dangerous than the simple fact that they are fragmented. At least in our Systemology, an individual is aware of the programming that is engaged in daily life. They work to improve themselves by improving their control and handling of emotional flows and thought.

Where else are we finding efforts to improve living conditions for everyone, without exclusion?

I haven’t seen it.

Maybe before they try pushing people to breed more, they might consider what environmental conditions they are subjecting the living to.

Then they seem surprised and insulted when the abused — and ‘Excluded’ — fight back.

Well. For many, it certainly does get harder every day not to just say:

FUCK ‘EM.

>>> MARDUKITE SYSTEMOLOGY GUIDE FOR HANDLING SUPPRESSION <<<